Thursday, December 13, 2012
Breaking the Addiction
Monday, November 26, 2012
Living Aloha
For those who embrace the Aloha Spirit, the Islands become a huge oyster, with a giant pearl of friendship, wisdom, respect and joy that fills your heart and nourishes your soul. I think Queen Lili’uokalani put it best when she said, “…hear what is not said, to see what cannot be seen, and to know the unknowable- that is Aloha..."
Monday, November 5, 2012
2012 PDN PhotoPlus Expo: Four Days of Non-Stop Photo Fun
Thursday, October 4, 2012
Having so much Fun, It Should be Illegal
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Days of My Youth
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Remember When…
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Don’t Judge a Book by its Cover, or You Might Have an 11-D Mouth

Several weeks ago, I blogged my dismay of the new Canon 5D MARK III’s specifications (Canon: Whiskey Tango Foxtrot), which at first blush, showed no significant upgrade for an outdoor photographer – especially a 1MP increase in sensor size.
After speaking with Canon’s Michael Nadler at the Palm Springs Photo Festival, and having some hands-on time with the camera, It’s obvious the camera’s specs barely scratch the surface of what this new body is capable of.
Thus, I have removed my left 11-D Columbia hiker and have inserted it into my mouth.
To be blunt, the camera is amazing. The processing and thru-put is blazing fast. Color rendition and shadow contrast is wonderful. And in low light, it’ll blow your mind away with incredible sharpness and eerily lack of digital noise.
According to Michael, Canon makes it all happen through gap less micro optics. Essentially, up to now, there were small gaps between pixels. Canon’s redeveloped their pixels so that there’s no gap, so the entire sensor can be used, with larger pixels to capture an image. In fact, the new CMOS sensor in the 5D MARK III (and 1DX) captures about 1/3 additional light than previous sensors. The results are sharper images, better clarity across the board and reduced digital noise.
Testing the MARK III against my tried-and-true MARK II revealed better contrast resolution, greatly reduced noise at ISO 400 and image thru-put (from the time the shutter is depressed until the image is fully written to the card) is nearly cut in half.
In a nutshell: Yes, Virginia. It blows away the 5D MARK II.
Where the MARK III really shines is in shooting sunsets: In my style of shooting, there’s a delicate balance between depth of field, diminishing light, and motion, which dictates a dance of decision between an extremely long shutter at a low ISO (for a relatively noiseless image, but a completely blurred motion of water) or a moderate ISO that permits me to slow the water’s movement (without making a foggy mess), but leaves the image with a noisy background. With the 5D MARK III, I can now advance my ISO comfortably to 800 + and retain a clean image.
Some of the forthcoming accessories are even more amazing. For instance, the new wireless file transmitter (WFT-E7A) supports the wireless IEEE 802.11n protocol, which promises file transfers up to three-times faster than the a/g protocol used on older WFT units, the transmitter also includes an internal Bluetooth function for connecting to third-party GPS devices, and I don’t doubt we’ll see a firmware update at some point and time that would allow for remote capture via Bluetooth connected device (think iPad or Android smart phone). The new Wireless File Transmitter also supports DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance), so you can check out your images on a TV or mobile device.
So don’t be fooled by the spec sheet. The 5D MARK III is the supercharged version of its predecessor, and I’ll be posting images soon of what this camera can do… now that a MARK III resides in my camera bag.
Friday, March 30, 2012
Backing Up is Hard to Do
Shutter Bug Radio
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Canon: Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
I’ve been a Canon shooter since 1992. I turned to Canon after I had several bad repair experiences with Pentax, when my then PZ-1 decided that autofocus wasn’t something I really needed, or should use. I had spent three months shuttling the camera back-and-forth between their Colorado repair facility and my local camera shop. The Pentax techs insisted the camera was working properly, yet the store owner and I couldn’t get any lens to autofocus on my PZ-1 body.
After that third journey to the Centennial State, I consigned two bodies, five lenses and two flashes for sale. In turn, I bought two Canon A2 film bodies, three lenses and a flash. When my order arrived, I was pleased as punch. The Canons felt better to my hand, and the “L” series glass blew me away, especially when shooting Fuji Velvia 50.
I merged to digital when the EOS D30 arrived in late 2000. I can remember covering the Los Angeles Auto Show, and the camera got about as much interest as the cars on display. I loved how the camera worked and reacted like a film camera, but with the ability to instantly capture, develop and download images as the new cars were unveiled. In the burgeoning Web, it gave me the ability to quickly update coverage on the fly.
As the years went by, and new Canon bodies were introduced, I upgraded as the technology advanced: 60D, 1D, 1Ds, 5D, 1D MARK III and 5D MARK II. With each upgrade came a significant upgrade in megapixels, write speed and numerous other features. Canon had a knack of anticipating just what the pro market needed, and delivered it in spades.
Currently, my bodies du jour are the 5D MARK II and 1D MARK III. The “Five” is my workhorse, which I use for capturing everything, sans whales or anything that requires rapid image capture. That’s where the 1D MARK III comes into play, with its 10 frames/second capture rate. The camera is also a boon to shooting wildlife with its APS-H imaging sensor, which affords a 1.3X crop factor. In layman’s terms, it gives a lens a range boost of 1.3-times.
Essentially, a 200mm lens becomes a 260mm and a 400 is essentially a 520mm – perfect to shooting whales, wildlife and sports, without the need for big (heavy and very expensive) long lenses and keeping a safe distance. Besides, hand holding a $10,500, seven-pound, 500mm lens, while photographing whales from a 30’ Zodiac is a pain in the you-know-what. Give me a $1,600, 100-400mm zoom that weighs three pounds and a 1.3 crop factor – and get more range - any day.
Both of my cameras are getting “long in the tooth,” and I’ve been anxiously awaiting their replacements. The 1D MARK IV replacement arrived in October, 2011, with the 1Dx. Its specifications will make any sports shooter water: 18 MP, 13 frames/second shooting, new Digic 5 processor and of course, dual card slots among the many upgrades. For my needs, the new camera had a significant drawback: Canon merged the smaller, 1D, APS-H sensor and the 1Ds full-frame sensor camera together to create the 1Dx, hence the full-frame sensor in the “x.” Essentially, pros shooting the full-frame 1Ds saw a decrease in pixels from 21MP to 18MP, and 1D users gained megapixels (16 to 18), but lost the coveted magnification.
The 5D MARK III was released about a week ago, amid several years of rumors that the new “III” would have a robust jump in megapixels (most blogs reported 32 was the magical number), processing speed, better sealing against the elements and the possibility of dual card slots. What Canon release was what was hoped for, except an increase of megapixels. The new camera gets a whopping one-megapixel boost from 21 to 22. The new sensor has a big jump in light capturing ISO, but it’s a miracle if I ever bump sensor sensitivity to ISO 400. It also receives a host of video related upgrades - perfect for Canon’s fight against Red’s “Scarlet” camera, but does nothing for a nature photographer shooting stills. Oh, then there’s the price of the new camera, a $1,300 increase over the current 5D MARK II.
According to Canon, the upgrades made to the 1D and 5D series are “what pros asked for.” Polling my friends in the industry, we’re wondering just who Canon questioned, as the upgrades are not what many nature and sports photographers would want in an upgrade. This leaves a lot of photographers with Canon equipment exclaiming, “What the…”
It’s interesting to note that while Canon appears to have shifted its focus to catering to videographers, Nikon still embraces the needs and desires of the landscape still shooter, as evidenced with the addition of the full-frame, 36MP sensor D800, which carries features similar to the 5D MARK III, although it’s frame-per-second rate is much slower (4 fps for the Nikon vs. 6 fps for the Canon). I have not had the opportunity to “play” with the D800, but in images I’ve seen, the detail is nothing short of incredible. For my particular style of image making (where detail makes or breaks an image), this new camera whets my appetite.
Yes, my friends who shoot Nikon are already teasing me that I’ve “seen the light” of Nikon.
In reality, switching systems is an arduous task. I’ve accumulated 12 lenses, a couple of flash units, a few tele-extenders and extension tubes, plus a bounty of accessories. None of which is compatible with the Nikon system, and replacing it all would cost somewhere in the range of a nice, new Porsche.
So on behalf of many photographers (myself included), I humbly ask Canon to go back to the drawing board. I don’t want to pay a grand more for a one megapixel increase in sensor performance. Please give is a 5D MARK III s, with a 34-36 MP sensor and all the trinkets in the new version of the “5,” but without all the video stuff. We don’t use it anyway. We capture the beauty of the world, one image at a time.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Oooohhhh…
In his role as Forrest Gump, Tom Hanks made a great summation when he said, “Life is like a box of chocolates. You never know that you’re gonna get.” Sunrises and sunsets are the same way: even if the sky is deeply overcast, don’t discount the possibility of getting a great shot. And even if the day looks great, the sunset may not be flattering.
Case in point: I was on the Big Island for a couple days of shooting Hawaiian Green Sea Turtles (honu) that come out in the afternoon to nap after gorging themselves on Limu (Hawaiian seaweed). There was a deep overcast (Mother Nature’s soft box) that hung over the Island all day, which worked well for photographing the honu, but probably wouldn’t bode well for that evening’s sunset. As my flight back to Maui was later in the evening, I decided to chance a good sunset, and I set about finding a good location.
I found the right spot about 30 minutes before sundown. Tucked beside a small beach, a small lava bay opened towards the ocean - the lava topography providing ample places for the ocean to bounce and course its way towards shore like a pinball machine of sea foam. It was beautiful, but the drab overcast left the scene looking dank and dull. I setup my camera anyway, hoping that the atmospheric conditions would change.
As time passed, the conditions did change. More clouds rolled in, and with 15-minutes before sunset, I was beginning to feel as though I was in Seattle in January, albeit much warmer.
With five minutes left on the sunset clock, the sky started to gain a pinkish glow and the sun started to peek through a small break in the clouds. As the sun descended through the thick layer of vog, it shone like a crimson orb, backlighting the rolling surf with intense aquas and white foam. It was two minutes of sheer bliss that ended as quickly as it began.
Similarly, I’ve seen countless days where I’ve left my studio in incredible weather, get to my shooting location, setup the camera and watch it deteriorate to downright ugly within minutes. It’s truly interesting how opportunity and chance interplay in photography, especially when it comes to weather and other atmospheric conditions.
This week, the weather has been rather bipolar: High winds, driving rain, and thick clouds followed by clear and sunny skies, all changing by the hour. That still didn’t stop me from dragging a friend along with me to Mokapu beach to catch a sunset. As I setup my tripod, he was hesitant, bemoaning the prevailing conditions which weren’t favorable. I convinced him to setup his gear, luring him with a Diet Coke.
Looking at my watch, I knew the sun had about 20 minutes before it dropped beneath the horizon, but you could have fooled us at the darkening gray scene. In moments, the cloud layer at the horizon thinned, the sun peeked through, and a warm glow settled over the ocean. A collective “Oooohhh” Our shutters started clicking and the clouds literally parted.
With the sun set and twilight’s glow upon us, we marveled at the incredible scene that evolved from nothing. We took a chance and were rewarded. The weather today isn’t all that great, but I’m going to chance it. I can’t wait to see what surprise is in store for my lens tonight.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Looking Back to Look Forward
I celebrated my 43rd year on Mother Earth last week. I received a bunch of well wishes, thoughts and questions. There was one email from a friend that made me stop and think, which turned into several hours of pondering. The question was: “If you could have a do-over in life, what would you do differently, and what would you be shooting?”
That’s a difficult one to answer, as we’re a product of our collective experiences. Are there opportunities, decisions and risks I might have chosen differently? Sure. Would I be the same person I am today? Definitely not.
There are certainly times where I should have weighed the risks of pushing my body beyond what I thought I could do (which probably would have saved a few trips to the doctor, and a drawer full of splints and braces), done a little better diligence prepping for photo trips (especially in allotting time) and listened more to, and put more stock in, my inner voice (or gut feeling). There were days when I planned to go shooting, but didn’t for some reason or another, only to learn that I had missed some of the biggest waves ever seen at Pe’ahi (Jaws), or the elusive green flash at sunset.
Looking back, there were certainly a few opportunities I wished I hadn’t passed on (such as taken the race car driver path, or extended my career as an automotive journalist), but they don’t invoke the “What the heck was I thinking?!” slap to the back of the head. And yes, there were a few opportunities that I jumped in feet first with great anticipation, work and determination, only later to leave penniless and scarred deeply.
But this life that I’ve been blessed to live – through the roller coaster of life that included the good, the bad and sometimes the ugly – is one I would never change.
For me, life is like photography. It’s seeing things, and working in a unique way that is completely your own. It’s an endless learning curve where we make mistakes, and (hopefully) learn from them, so we don’t (again, hopefully) make the same mistake again. Similarly, we try a new photo technique or something different in life and learn and new trade or a new way to make images.
Heck, I’ve shunned peanut butter for most of my life (it was a consistency thing). I finally tried it again last year, and now I can’t get enough of it (especially macadamia nut butter – ono grinds!).
The thought of changing my photography style (and even my chosen genre of imagery) sends shivers down my spine. I’ve always had too passions in my life: Cars and nature. There are no two subjects I’d rather capture (well, I might add antique and classic power boats to that list, as there’s nothing like a wooden boat with a Packard Liberty V12 beneath the hatch).
That all said, there is one thing I wish I could definitely change: I wish I had a bit more melanin in my complexion so I wouldn’t have to slather myself in SPF 5,000 every time I wanted to go outdoors! Besides, sun burns are a pain… literally.

